Abdul El-Sayed pulled off an upset Senate primary win despite being vastly outspent by Haley Stevens, and Timmer explains why money alone couldn’t buy this race. He digs into the deeper story: a bipartisan wave of economic anxiety, skyrocketing healthcare costs, and voters in both parties desperate to punish incumbents and reward outsiders with a clear message.

On the Republican side, Timmer offers a sharp, insider’s take on Mike Rogers: the one-time mainstream Republican who “went into deep freeze” in 2014 and reemerged in 2026 running a MAGA-era campaign with 1990s instincts, all while carrying a voting record on the Affordable Care Act that clashes with what voters actually want.

Join the fight at committeetoprotect.org.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@pagingamerica

Subscribe, share, and leave a rating to help more people find Paging America.

Have thoughts, questions, or your own health care story? Email us at feedback@pagingamerica.org.

There has been recent reporting that Blanche privately told religious leaders he intends to use the Comstock Act to ban mailing medication abortion nationwide. They discuss why this isn't just a "red state" issue. In fact, even states with constitutional abortion protections, like California and Michigan, could see medication abortion access cut off.

We also discuss Blanche's record dismissing FACE Act cases meant to protect clinics and providers. This is a call to action for voters in states with pivotal Senate seats like Maine, Alaska, and Ohio to speak up before the full Senate vote.

They dig into who’s really absorbing the cost: safety-net and rural hospitals, many already teetering on closure, are seeing deficits balloon as uninsured patients still show up needing (and legally guaranteed) care. Dr. Stevens shares an on-the-ground look at Minnesota’s own near-miss with a major safety-net hospital closure, and explains why labor and delivery units, which are often the first services cut, are driving a growing maternal care crisis in rural communities.

The conversation also turns to politics: Donald Trump’s approval ratings has fallen into the low 30s in some recent polls. Miles and Dr. Stevens explore whether healthcare pain is starting to catch up with public opinion and what it might mean heading into the midterms.

We cover what’s missing from the proposal, what’s at risk, and why handing people money for “choice” isn’t the same as making healthcare affordable or effective. We make the case that healthcare policy should be judged by outcomes like healthier patients and stronger hospitals and NOT campaign slogans.

Tune in, subscribe, and hold your elected officials accountable this election season.

Generic drugs run on razor-thin margins that make U.S. manufacturing nearly impossible, and the staggering reality that six in ten Americans already worry about affording their prescriptions, with one in five rationing their medication. The conversation turns to India’s outsized role supplying roughly half of U.S. generic prescriptions by volume, and what could happen if manufacturers start looking to diversify away from the American market well before any tariffs even take effect.

Dr. Lyerly makes the case that if the administration were serious about reshoring production, it would be working with Congress on bills like the PILLS Act, MEDS Act, and MAPS Act, which offer incentives rather than blunt-force tariffs. They also note that this policy arrives as a “Plan B” after an earlier version was ruled illegal, raising the likelihood of legal challenges and a long stretch of uncertainty — not exactly the environment that encourages companies to invest in new manufacturing plants.

They dig into the claims used to justify tighter restrictions and explain why, as physicians, they see these justifications as disconnected from the actual medical evidence on mifepristone's safety.

They also discuss the FDA's ongoing "scientific review" of the drug, the historical basis for restricting mailed medication under the 1873 Comstock Act, and the hearing's timing alongside testimony from Jeffrey Epstein survivors.

Join the fight at committeetoprotect.org.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@pagingamerica

Subscribe, share, and leave a rating to help more people find Paging America.

Have thoughts, questions, or your own health care story? Email us at feedback@pagingamerica.org.

They break down support for major reforms, including expanding ACA subsidies, a public option, lowering the Medicare eligibility age, and Medicare for All, all of which poll surprisingly well, even across party lines. But the numbers also reveal a catch: the more specific and unfamiliar a policy, the shakier public support gets, and many voters remain skeptical Democrats will actually make corporations and the wealthy pay for it.

Dr. Rob makes the case for a simple governing philosophy: stop relitigating policy mechanics before you have the power to enact any of them, unify around “affordable healthcare for everyone,” win, and then fight over the details once you’re holding the gavel.

READ the polling from Navigator: https://navigatorresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Navigator-Update-07.14.2026.pdf

Plus, we talk about the mounting toll of the "big ugly bill," with new data showing roughly 8 million Americans have lost health coverage since its passage and rising premiums squeezing the commercial insurance market. Woodhouse also weighs in on the odds of a third reconciliation bill before the midterms, and why healthcare has become one of the most potent issues in American politics heading into the election year.

Learn more about Protect Our Care at https://www.protectourcare.org/

In this Paging America: On Call episode, Dr. Rob Davidson sits down with Dr. Erin Stevens from The Situation Womb to unpack a sudden and alarming political pivot: the growing conservative push to oppose and even ban In Vitro Fertilization (IVF).

A recent op-ed written by The Family Foundation in Kentucky argues that the pro-life movement is being intellectually and politically inconsistent by widely supporting in vitro fertilization (IVF) while strongly opposing abortion.

Dr Stevens calls it a "nefarious scheme" to limit bodily autonomy, control family planning, and restrict women's career and life choices.